12 July 2023
.
.
“But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand.” [Ezekiel 33:6]
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” [Ephesians 6:12]
Presbyterians Week Headlines
[1] Life Legal Defense Foundation Fights Biden Administration’s Scheme to Kill Children in Hospital ERs
Additional Articles of Interest
—
[1] Life Legal Defense Foundation Fights Biden Administration’s Scheme to Kill Children in Hospital ERs
NEWS PROVIDED BY
Life Legal Defense Foundation
July 7, 2023
WASHINGTON, July 7, 2023 /Christian Newswire/ — After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year, Democrats were determined to find ways to prevent pro-life states from protecting babies in the womb. When the Biden administration attempted to use a federal emergency room law to override state laws restricting abortion, the state of Texas filed suit.
One scheme the pro-aborts came up with was a novel application of the “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act,” or EMTALA. This 1986 bipartisan law prohibits “dumping” of indigent patients by requiring federally funded hospitals to assess and treat patients with emergency medical conditions, regardless of their ability to pay. A later amendment to the law made clear that, when dealing with pregnant women, hospitals must consider the well-being of both the woman and her “unborn child.”
The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued guidance to hospitals “reminding” them of their “obligation” to continue to provide abortions even in states where abortion is illegal. A Texas District Court blocked HHS’ guidance in part because HHS “discards the requirement to consider the welfare of unborn children.”
This week, Life Legal filed an amicus brief urging the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold the right of unborn children to emergency medical care. We argue that the use of the word “individual” in EMTALA should be construed to include an unborn child. This would allow unborn children harmed by violations of the law to seek legal recourse for their injuries – and would impose a commensurate obligation on hospitals and physicians to provide emergency care for children in the womb, rather than aborting them.
We also argue that EMTALA does not preempt state laws restricting or prohibiting abortion. Under the plain terms of the law, only conflicting state law “requirements” are pre-empted under EMTALA, not prohibitions.
Texas law includes civil and criminal penalties for abortionists, which resulted in every abortion provider leaving the state. Although women can still legally obtain and ingest abortion drugs in Texas, existing restrictions have resulted in nearly 10,000 children being born rather than aborted since the Supreme Court overturned Roe.
“We stand with Texas in challenging HHS guidance that distorts the purpose of EMTALA to deny hard-won protections to children in the womb,” said Life Legal CEO Alexandra Snyder. “The Biden administration cannot now use EMTALA to turn emergency rooms into abortion mills.”
About Life Legal Defense Foundation
Life Legal Defense Foundation was established in 1989, and is a nonprofit organization composed of attorneys and other concerned citizens committed to giving helpless and innocent human beings of any age, and their advocates, a trained and committed voice in the courtrooms of our nation. For more information about the Life Legal Defense Foundation, visit www.lldf.org.
+ Christian News Wire, 2020 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, Washington DC 20006, 202-546-0054, newsdesk@christiannewswire.com
+ Life Legal Defense Foundation, Post Office Box 2105, Napa, California 94558, 707-224-6675, Fax: 707-224-6676, info@lldf.org
A social worker has taken legal action against a health care provider for the NHS after a job offer was withdrawn following the discovery that he held Christian beliefs on marriage and human sexuality.
Mr Felix Ngole, 45, from Yorkshire, who is being supported by the Christian Legal Centre, was left gobsmacked when he was told by Touchstone Support Leeds bosses that unless he could demonstrate how he would ‘embrace and promote homosexual rights’ at the organisation, the job offer would be withdrawn.
Furthermore, he was suddenly told that he would be expected to attend LGB and Transgender awareness training but would not be free to share his views despite others being free to share theirs.
He was told his beliefs did not ‘align’ with Touchstone’s ethos as an ‘inclusive employer’ and that he posed a risk to the organisations’ reputation.
Prior to this, in May 2022, Mr Ngole was the best performing candidate in interview having gained the highest marks of any candidate on an equality and diversity assessment, and so had been offered the role of Mental Health Support Worker, which Touchstone had been recruiting for on behalf of the NHS.
There was nothing in the job description or job advert, which Mr Ngole was originally emailed by Indeed.co.uk, which presented such a prerequisite to work for the organisation that supports 10,000 people across Yorkshire each year.
Mr Ngole applied for what he described as his ‘dream job’ as he has experience supporting individuals with mental health issues from all walks of life, in hospital and homecare settings, and has the professional qualifications to do so.
The role would have involved working at Wakefield Hospital to manage the discharge of patients with mental health conditions into the community.
After providing references, however, Touchstone’s chief executive, Kathryn Hart, discovered articles, including a piece by the BBC which revealed that Mr Ngole had won a landmark legal case in 2019.
Court of Appeal ruling
In 2015, the University of Sheffield had removed Mr Ngole from studying for a social work degree after an anonymous complaint was made about how he expressed his biblical belief that marriage is between a man and woman and that homosexual practice is sinful during a debate on Facebook.
In the legal battle that followed, the Court of Appeal ruling found that Mr Ngole had not, and was unlikely to, discriminate against anyone because of his beliefs and that the university had unlawfully removed him from the course.
During the case, university lawyers went as far as to suggest that even Mother Theresa would be barred from working in the social work profession if she expressed the same Christian beliefs as Mr Ngole.
The ruling represented a major development of the law which should have resulted in Christians having the legal right to express Biblical views on social media or elsewhere without fear for their professional careers.
The judgment said:
‘The University wrongly confused the expression of religious views with the notion of discrimination. The mere expression of views on theological grounds (e.g. that ‘homosexuality is a sin’) does not necessarily connote that the person expressing such views [the Claimant] will discriminate on such grounds. In the present case, there was positive evidence to suggest that [Mr Ngole] had never discriminated on such grounds in the past and was not likely to do so in the future (because, as he explained, the Bible prohibited him from discriminating against anybody).’
In the BBC piece discovered by Touchstone, Mr Ngole was quoted in response to the ruling saying: “As Christians we are called to serve others and to care for everyone, yet publicly and privately we must also be free to express our beliefs and what the bible says without fear of losing our livelihoods.”
Following the ruling, Mr Ngole, who sought asylum in this country in 2003 after fleeing violent persecution in Cameroon, returned to the University of Sheffield to complete his social work degree and has since gained employment in the field.
‘Must actively promote LGBTQ+ rights’
Despite this, Mr Ngole was told by Touchstone’s chief executive that the reasons for withdrawing the employment offer was that he was now unsuitable for the position as they had: ‘unfortunately identified some significant areas for concern regarding your suitability for both the role and Touchstone as an organisation. In particular we have uncovered some information about you [Mr Ngole] that does not align with Touchstone Leeds’ ethos and values; we are an organisation proud to work with the LGBTQ+ community and we pride ourselves for being an inclusive employer.’
Asking what had been found, Mr Ngole was told that articles had been found on google which: ‘In particular, we can see that you have very strong views against homosexuality and same sex marriage, which completely go against the views of Touchstone, an organisation committed to actively promoting and supporting LGBTQ+ rights’.
The email went on to say that: ‘In particular, we have serious concerns that your [Mr Ngole’s] ability to act in the best interests of Touchstone, its service users and its staff would be compromised by your strong views’.
Ms Hart’s email concluded by saying that Touchstone may reconsider its decision if Mr Ngole was ‘able to give us assurances that your role would not be compromised by your views’.
As part of these assurances, Mr Ngole was required to ‘embrace and promote’ Touchstone’s values, ‘including the promotion of homosexual rights’. If he would not give these assurances, the email made clear the decision to withdraw the offer would stand.
Mr Ngole gave personal assurances that he would not discriminate against anyone whilst making clear his stance on his Christian beliefs by saying: ‘What I cannot do, and you cannot reasonably expect me to do without yourselves being discriminatory, is make my participation in the ‘promotion of homosexual rights’ a condition of my employment’.
Invited into another meeting, Mr Ngole said compared to the warm welcome he received at his first interview, the atmosphere was hostile. In the two-hour interrogation that followed, he was cross examined at length about his beliefs, ultimately resulting in the decision to withdraw the offer of employment being sustained.
The minutes from the meeting detailed that Mr Ngole said he had ‘never been accused of discrimination, nor do you [Mr Ngole] have any intention to discriminate against anyone’. The panel, without further explanation, however, concluded that ‘this rather misses the point’.
Supported by the Christian Legal Centre, Mr Ngole has now taken legal action with a hearing set to take place from Monday 10 – 14 July at Leeds Employment Tribunal.
Mr Ngole will make claims under the Equality Act for direct discrimination, harassment, indirect discrimination, and compensation for injury to feelings.
He will also be seeking a recommendation that Touchstone amend its recruitment procedures to align with its stated objective of being an ‘inclusive employer’ so as not to preclude practising Christians from its workforce.
‘I had to pledge allegiance to LGBT or be unemployable’
Ahead of the hearing, Mr Ngole, said: “I was told I was the best candidate for the job, then they suddenly said I was unemployable because they discovered that I am a Christian.
“No one has ever told me that I have not treated them well in my professional experience. I have never been accused of forcing my beliefs on anyone. I have supported vulnerable individuals from all backgrounds, including LGBT.
“I was delighted to be invited to the interview so that I could showcase my skills. I saw it as a step closer to my dream job. It was a brilliant interview; I was greeted warmly, and they were really kind to me.
“I was offered the job and they were already talking to me about my first day and who my line manager would be. When I received the email telling me that the job had been withdrawn it was a shock. I was very confused and distraught, and I wanted to know why.
“The reasons they gave for withdrawing the job offer were an attack on me and my faith.
“They made it seem that 100% of the people I would be helping would be LGBT, and that I had to pledge allegiance to the LGBT flag and forget about my Christian beliefs.
“It is untenable for employers to be allowed to discriminate against Christian beliefs in this way and to force individuals to promote an ideology that goes against their conscience in the workplace.
“There was no mutual respect, and no tolerance and inclusion of me and my beliefs whatsoever.
“If we get to the point where if you don’t celebrate and support LGBT you can’t have a job, then every Christian out there doesn’t have a future. You can study as much as you like, but you will not have a chance.
“The UK is no longer the country I heard about all those years ago when fleeing Cameroon. The UK then was a bastion of free speech and expression.
“I have no choice but to pursue justice again because if this is happening to me it will be happening to Christians and individuals from all beliefs and backgrounds across the country.
“I was once an asylum seeker; I had no job, no home, but those in my community treated me with great kindness. I have to show that kindness, not just because I’m a Christian, but also because that is what I received.
“I cannot deny my faith to get a job. One day I will leave this world and I won’t leave with anything other than my faith. I will be happy to be a cleaner, if need be, as long as I keep my faith and am right before God.”
Viewpoint discrimination
Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said: “Telling an employee that they must ‘embrace and promote’ homosexuality as a condition of employment sets a dark and troubling precedent. If left unchallenged it would see Christians who manifest their beliefs barred from working in the NHS and other institutions.
“Felix loves Jesus and the bible’s teaching, and you could not ask for a more compassionate mental health worker to support the most vulnerable in our communities.
“The NHS and its providers need more social workers like Felix Ngole, not fewer.
“What we see here is the confident totalitarianism of an organisation that has been captured by Stonewall and will do anything to keep their Stonewall ranking as high as possible.
“Viewpoint discrimination is escalating in the UK at an alarming rate. We have seen in the recent cases of high street banks denying Christians and free speech advocates the right to a bank account how far organisations captured by Stonewall are prepared to go. Anyone who does not comply and celebrate LGBT ideology must become a ‘non-person.’
“The Court of Appeal judgment in Felix’s case against the University of Sheffield was a major development of the law and must be upheld and respected in current and future Christian freedom cases.”
+ Christian Concern, 70 Wimpole Street, London W1G 8AX, England, 020 7935 1488, Contact Page
Additional Articles of Interest
– The Global Warming Scam: The Lie
– The Covid-19 “Killer Vaccine” and the Worldwide Depopulation Agenda
– Claims that UK’s Temperature Last Month Was “The Hottest Since Records Began” Is a Lie
– Lancet Study PROVES Covid Jabs Killed Large Numbers of People While Government Covered It Up
– In UK, Police Can Arrest Parents for NOT PAYING for Their Child’s Sex ‘Transition’!
– U.S. Department of Defense Issued Contract for ‘COVID-19 Research’ in Ukraine in 2019
– American Churches Are Eerily Silent When the Country Needs Them Most
– Climate Fearmongering Reaches Stratospheric Heights
– Church of England Archbishop: ‘The Lord’s Prayer’ is Problematic
– The Story of Pfizer Inc. – A Case Study in Pharmaceutical Empire and Corporate Corruption
Comments are closed for this Article !